It is a common misconception that solar energy is cheaper than utility energy. In reality, the initial cost of installing a solar system may cost you a little more than you would pay for ZESA over a span of 3-5years. While solar technology is still developing and becoming cheaper, it is not yet at a point where it can compete with traditional utilities on cost alone.
Instead, solar energy should be marketed based on its convenience and clean energy benefits. Solar systems have a payback period of three to five years, after which they can provide free energy for up to 20 years. Additionally, a good solar system can last up to 25 years, which makes it a valuable long-term investment.
One factor that must be considered is the cost of battery banks, which are typically included in solar installations. The battery banks may need to be replaced after five years, which requires an additional lump sum investment.
When considering the benefits of solar energy, it is important to factor in the potential costs of being without traditional utilities. Solar energy provides a reliable source of power even in the event of an outage, which can be a significant convenience for many people.
In conclusion, solar energy is not necessarily cheaper than traditional utilities. However, it is a valuable long-term investment that can provide clean energy and convenience. It is important to market solar energy based on these benefits rather than cost savings alone.
By Tatenda Zimunya